Hyperthermia and Cancer

It has been documented in numerous studies, that not only is cancer vulnerable to an alkaline pH and high levels of oxygen, but cancer cells are also more vulnerable to heat than healthy cells.

If you heat up tissue enough to kill the cancer cells, but not enough to damage the healthy tissue, you have a targeted therapy.

The reason heat kills cancer cells and not healthy cells is that cancer cells derive their energy from a fermentation process which occurs in cells at lower levels of oxygen.  When heat is applied to a cancer cell, it speeds up the rate at which it ferments to produce energy.  This generates acidic waste products at a rate which is too fast for the cell to remove them, so it is killed by its own metabolic products.  This is called acidosis.

The heat also stimulates tumour cells to release specific proteins onto their outer membranes, which enable our immune system to recognise them as cancer cells – thereby triggering our natural immune response against them.

Local hyperthermia can heat up a localised tumour, but if the cancer has spread, (or is harder to isolate), whole-body hyperthermia can create an artificial fever to cause a generalised response.

Local hyperthermia, brought about by a radio emitter fed into a catheter for 3 hours, has proven to be very effective at treating prostate cancer at centres in Germany, (such as the Klinik St. Georg in Bad Aibling, South Germany), with literally thousands of patients symptom-free years later.

In some centres, they can also combine this with added intravenous vitamin C, selenium, and zinc to help stimulate a greater immune response.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.


My son has acute lymphoblastic leukemia – how can we support his treatment?


My son is 4 years old and has been diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.  He has started his chemotherapy already, but please advise as to the efforts we can put in on our part.


Thank you for your email.  Whilst I am not legally allowed to give medical advice, (please see my medical disclaimer), if I was in your situation I would definitely look into getting a juicer.

This is different to a blender or smoothie maker.  A good quality juicer (and preferably a masticating juicer) will crush fruit and vegetables to release purely the liquid contained within.  A good juicer crushes almost every single cell, so that the pulp is dry afterwards.

The reason I say this, is that you can give your child all manner of very healthy fruit and vegetables that they would not normally consider eating.  If you use apples as a base, with oranges and lime to disguise the taste, you can add broccoli, spinach, carrot, and a number of other anti-cancer vegetables that have been shown to kill or inhibit cancer cells.

Blackberries, strawberries, blueberries and red grapes are all good anti-cancer foods.  Ginger is excellent, but has a strong taste, so your child may not want it.

I know of no other way to ensure that a child will consume upwards of 12 portions of fruit and vegetables per day to support their recovery and to help minimise the harmful effects of the treatment.  Kiwifruit has even been shown to prevent DNA damage.

During treatment, it may be very difficult for them to consume anything, given the side-effects of chemotherapy, but if they are getting quality raw, organic fruit and vegetable juice, then it is the best you can do nutritionally unless you also add supplements.  Fresh juice is also best if consumed within 30 minutes of juicing, so that it does not oxidise.

I would also ensure that my child was getting enough omega-3 oils.  The best way is to buy cold pressed organic flax seed oil and to put it on your child’s dinner.  For an adult with cancer, two tablespoons per day is ideal, so for a child 5ml (a teaspoon) per day would be fine.

If you haven’t already purchased the book, Cancer Uncensored, you can learn more about the best foods for your child in the nutrition section of this website.

You can also check out the latest alternative medicine options.  I appreciate that in your case, you are already pursuing chemotherapy.  But in a perfect world, I would recommend you undertake a chemosensitivity test, in order to discover what chemotherapy drugs and natural compounds actually kill your son’s cancer cells, and perhaps just as importantly, which ones do not work.  That way, you can focus on the most effective treatments and supplement with any natural substances that have been shown to kill his particular cancer.

But as with anything medical, I must make a medical disclaimer that nothing in this website is to be considered medical advice and that you should discuss any treatment options or nutritional choices with your doctor.

I sincerely wish you, your son and the rest of your family the best of luck and good health.

Kind Regards
Chris - Cancer Uncensored Signature
Christopher Evans
Author of Cancer Uncensored

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Insulin Potentiation / Insulin Potentiated Chemotherapy (IPT)

Cancer cells have many more sugar and insulin receptors than normal cells.  Which gives your doctor a unique opportunity to exploit this in order to make chemotherapy much more effective (and with less side-effects).

If you eat sugar, and your pancreas releases insulin (which tells your cells to store the sugar), the cancer cells are able to absorb much more sugar than other cells.

If you lower a person’s blood sugar to 50mg/dl, or even as low as 30mg/dl, then the starving tumour is very receptive to receiving more sugar.  In effect, the doors are wide open to taking materials into the cancer cells.

This dramatically increases the cancer cells’ vulnerability to low doses of chemotherapy – allowing much less to work in a much more targeted way.  As little as just 20% of the usual dose is still effective, yet does not damage other bodily systems in the same way as conventional chemotherapy.

After this process, the patient can be brought back up to normal blood sugar levels and then exposed to hyperthermia, which also increases the effectiveness of the chemotherapy.  Chemotherapy loaded cancer cells exposed to hyperthermia for around 60 to 90 minutes are often significantly damaged, and this has been used to effectively treat brain cancers, pancreatic cancers, lung cancer, sarcoma and more, at clinics in Germany.

My wife and I combined this approach with a chemosensitivity test in order to determine which of 15 different chemotherapy drugs her cancer cells were most vulnerable to.  It turned out that 11 of the potential chemotherapy drugs were borderline useless, one killed 60% of her cultured cancer cells, one killed 78% of them and another killed 82% of them.  This information was invaluable in choosing the right compound for her.

This is common sense science, but unfortunately it is not yet mainstream medicine in the US and UK.  We had the chemosensitivity test carried out in the UK, but for treatment, we had to travel to Germany but it was still relatively affordable.  Contact us for more information if you want to know more about the diagnostic tests we conducted and where we went for treatment.

(As a sidenote, the chemosensitivity test also tested for over 25 natural substances which may kill cancer cells, and this highlighted over a dozen natural compounds we could supplement with.  Substances that killed between 30 to 50% of her cultured cancer cells!  To take this a step further, we had these substances made into a topical cream that my wife could put directly on her tumour – although not everyone will be able to do this due to the location of their cancer).

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Recommended Books on Cancer Prevention and Treatment

Whilst Cancer Uncensored the book, is a complete reference guide to cancer prevention, early detection and survival, I would always advise people to read around the subject so that they can make their own informed decisions when it comes to their health.  By all means, consult with your Doctor… but ultimately all decisions regarding your own health are yours.

I found the following books to be immensely helpful.

I will constantly add my recommended books on cancer prevention and treatment over time, so please check back here often.  Equally, I will also add resources for recipes, anti-cancer diet strategies and more.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Alternative Medicine for Cancer Patients

“If you are in the health profession and want to get a lot of people angry at you, begin to cure incurable diseases”.  David J Getoff, Naturopath and Board Certified Clinical Nutritionist.

The following articles represent a comprehensive guide to the alternative medicine or integrated medicine available for people with cancer.

This section has been entitled Alternative Medicine because it is not permitted to be called “treatment” under current legislation / regulations.

This is unfortunate, because much of this medicine is based upon solid scientific principles.  It just involves methodologies that are not easy to monetise, cannot be patented, or else are from outside of the mainstream medicine and pharmaceutical “club”.

As a result, mainstream medicine will criticise the level of data available, whilst simultaneously refusing to make the funding or research opportunities available to help it to become part of accepted mainstream medicine.  Equally, history is always written by the victor, so do not believe everything you read!  Numerous senior researchers have gone on record, stating that the pharmaceutical giants they work for have falsified research data in order to suppress potentially revolutionary treatments or to advance weak or dangerous treatments into which they have invested.

Whilst I strongly suggest you read the articles below, I must reiterate (for legal reasons) that the discussion of any of these forms of alternative medicine is not an endorsement or recommendation.  This section is merely a starting point for your ongoing research and consultation with your Doctor.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Positive Psychology

Countless peer-reviewed scientific studies have demonstrated that maintaining a positive psychology can help with a range of illnesses, including cancer.  This is both in terms of prevention and recovery.  Take a look at the following articles for more information on how a positive mental attitude can help you.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Modern Cancer Treatment and Its Limitations

In many parts of the Western world, due to European directives and federal law, the only legally accepted cancer treatment protocols involve surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

“Why would a patient swallow a poison because he is ill, or take that which would make a well man sick?”  – L.F Kebler, M.D.

Does this mean that these are the only ways of treating cancer?  No.  But to offer anything else, your Doctor would risk losing their medical license, substantial fines and in the US, even a prison sentence.

In the late 1970s, after studying the policies, activities, and assets of the major U.S. cancer institutions, investigative reporters Robert Houston and Gary Null concluded that these institutions had become self-perpetuating organisations whose survival depended on the state of no cure.

They wrote, “a solution to cancer would mean the termination of research programs, the obsolescence of skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph over cancer would dry up contributions to self-perpetuating charities and cut off funding from Congress, it would mortally threaten the present clinical establishments by rendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological and chemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money, training and equipment is invested. Such fear, however unconscious, may result in resistance and hostility to alternative approaches in proportion as they are therapeutically promising. The new therapy must be disbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs, regardless of actual testing results, and preferably without any testing at all. As we shall see, this pattern has in actuality occurred repeatedly, and almost consistently.”

Indeed, many people around the world consider that they have been “cured” by therapies which have been “blacklisted” by the major cancer institutions and the medical community at large.

The individual Doctors are not necessarily to blame, but the system has overridden good conscience and common sense.

According to Dr Fereydoon Batmanghelidj, M.D, “we, as doctors, are really 007 agents of the pharmaceutical industry.  We are totally blind and ignorant that the pharmaceutical industry has hijacked medicine.  We learn a couple of years of physiology, but as soon as we go on the clinical side we are asked to forget those and begin to learn pharmacology, in order to treat symptoms rather than understand the primary cause of the health problem”.

This view is apparently shared by many Doctors, including Lorraine Day MD (former Chief Orthopaedic Surgeon, San Francisco hospital), but they are powerless to change the system.  She explained, “we doctors are taught in our medical training that virtually 80% of disease has no known cause.  We are not taught to treat the underlying cause of disease, we are only taught to treat the symptoms.  This does not get a person well!”

Dr Fritz Schellander explained that “Every now and again there are new drugs introduced. There is a great stir – but actually it only adds a matter of weeks or months to life expectancy.  Until recently there hasn’t been a single study that could conclusively show that radiotherapy to the breast has any effect on survival and yet we apply it almost routinely to often very young patients.  Many patients would not choose chemotherapy and radiotherapy if they knew the real facts, the real scientific evidence.  A study has been reported which claims that nearly 70% of oncologists would not opt for chemotherapy, if their turn came.”

Part of the way the stranglehold has been maintained is the way in which the success rate of mainstream treatments are reported.  The significant difference is between relative success rates and absolute success rates.

Firstly, let me define success rate.

In the cancer research industry, the closest thing you get to a “cure” is a five-year survival.  So if you survive five years and a day, you were a “success”.

Cancer is the only disease where you can die of the condition you were “successfully” treated for.  It sounds ludicrous, but this has enabled the cancer industry to massage statistics.

In the same vein, early detection has increased so-called survival rates, because by detecting the disease earlier, it isn’t necessarily that the patient will live longer overall, but they are more likely to survive five years from diagnosis.

What many people do not realise, is that their tumour may have taken as long as 10 years to develop to the extent where it was noticeable.

Therefore, much of the improvements in success rate of cancer treatment is down to the way the statistics are handled, as opposed to the actual effectiveness of the treatment.

The difference between relative success rates and absolute success rates is even more important.

Imagine you had a cancer treatment, where 2 more people out of every 100 people would survive five years after receiving it (as opposed to no treatment at all).  If you now develop a new cancer treatment, such as a different variation of chemotherapy, if it now saves 3 additional people out of every 100, it has a relative success rate of 50%.  This is because it “cures” 50% more people than the previous methodology.

However, if you were to express the data as an absolute success rate, you would say that the absolute success rate of that treatment was 3%.  i.e. 3 out of every 100 people.

Just to clarify, that does not mean only 3% of the people survive, it means that 3% MORE people survive than if offered no treatment at all.

Look how much easier it is to justify putting somebody through chemotherapy and radiotherapy when you can talk about a 50% relative success rate, rather than a 3% absolute success rate of the treatment.

A study of every randomised controlled clinical trial of chemotherapy performed in the US, (from 1990 to 2004), was conducted and published under the title “The Contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy to 5-year Survival in Adult Malignancies”.  The results showed the following cancer “cure” statistics attributable to chemotherapy – based upon absolute success rates:

Pancreas    0%
Soft Tissue Sarcoma    0%
Melanoma    0%
Uterus    0%
Prostate    0%
Bladder    0%
Kidney    0%
Unknown Primary Site    0%
Multiple Myeloma    0%
Stomach    0.7%
Colon    1%
Breast    1.4%
Head and neck    1.9%
Lung    2%
Rectum    3.4%
Brain    3.7%
Oesophagus    4.9%
Ovary    8.9%
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma    10.5%
Cervix    12%
Testes    37.7%
Hodgkin’s Disease    40.3%

Testicular cancer and Hodgkin’s disease, which both appear to be quite responsive to chemotherapy, only represent 2% of the total number of cancers.

When you strip away the relative success rates, modern chemotherapy, (which can destroy your immune system, and rob you of your quality of life without giving you any more time), leaves a lot to be desired.

“In oncology we have the problem that progress has been very, very slow and we are still living with the paradox of treating cancers with carcinogenic agents!  This feels completely wrong to me!”  – Dr Fritz Schellander

The overall average was a 2.1% improvement in five-year survival rate compared with not using chemotherapy at all.  The same process, when applied to Australian data resulted in a 2.4% improvement in five-year survival rate.

Again, just to clarify, it didn’t mean that only 2.1% of Americans survived cancer, it just meant that chemotherapy only contributed to an additional 2.1% people having a five-year survival rate.

It is no wonder that the American Cancer Society stated “Surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy seldom produce a cure” in their “Cancer facts and figures 2007” literature.

So 2.1% more of the US patients survived for 5 years when given chemotherapy.  But for the 97.9% of patients who did not get an increase in five-year survival rate, let us look at the price they paid for the attempt – the side effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy include:

Abnormal ECG’s, Abdominal Cramps, Anemia, Arterial Damage, Bleeding Sores, Bleeding Ulcers, Blood Clotting, Bone Marrow Suppression, Brain Shrinking, Chromosomal Lesions, Chronic Radiation Proctitis, Constipation, Cumulative Toxicity, Cystitis, Deafness, Decreased White Cell Count, Dehydration [severe], Destroys linings of intestines, Destroys Mucous Membranes, Destroys Skin, Diarrhea [severe], Difficulty Absorbing Food, Dizziness, Endometriosis, Flu Symptoms, Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Hair Loss, Heart Disease, Hematological Problems, Hyper Sensitivity Reactions, Hypertension, Immune System Damage, Impaired Concentration, Impaired Eye Sight, Impaired Hearing, Impaired Language Skills, Impaired Memory, Impotence, Increased Infections, Joint Pain, Kidney Damage, Leucopenia, Liver Fibrosis, Liver Lesions, Loss of Appetite, Loss of Libido, Loss of Nerve Function, Loss of Taste, Lung Damage, Lymph edema, Malnutrition, Nausea, Necrosis, Neurological Damage, Neuropathy, Neutropenia, Nerve Damage, Numbness, Oral Ulcers, Permanent Disabilities, Psychological Distress, Radiation Burns, Radiation poisoning, Renal Dysfunction, Sexual Dysfunction, Soreness of Gums and Throat, Sterility, Stroke, Sudden Menopause, Suicide, Ulceration, Urinary Bleeding, Vascular Damage, Vomiting [severe], Weakness, Weight Loss, and TOXIC DEATH!

Was it really worth it?  Especially when you look at Doctors such as Dr Joseph Issels in Germany, who was able to get a 24% success rate from over 16,000 cases over a 40 year period using alternative therapies, even after chemotherapy and radiotherapy had done their damage.

Or a 22% 5-year success rate for “incurable” forms of brain cancer achieved by Dr Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D. in Texas, using his revolutionary Antineoplastons treatment.

Diffuse, intrinsic, childhood brainstem glioma had never before been cured in any scientifically controlled clinical trial in the history of medicine.  Now, Dr Burzynski has “cured” dozens of  patients as part of his FDA approved clinical trials – trials using treatment methods outside of the mainstream Western cancer treatment protocols.  This is after the FDA spent 10 years and $60 million of tax payer’s money trying to shut him down!

As I mentioned in the introduction of my book, Cancer Uncensored, I pull no punches.  This data is shocking and will feel contradictory to what we have been spoon-fed by the Cancer research organisations who are forever pushing the “cancer cure just around the corner” mentality, even whilst they throw more money at methodologies that have not improved survival rates for decades.

How on earth have the medical and cancer research communities been able to keep the fact that chemotherapy barely works under wraps?

Is a 2.1% improvement worth hundreds of billions of dollars in cancer research conducted over decades, when 85% of cancer is preventable in the first place?  If we had focused on prevention all those years ago, most of the cancer patients today would never be in the position to even need treatment.

In a recent patent application by the US government, (when they attempted to patent Dr Burzynski’s antineoplastons – which were already patented!), the US government even admitted, “Current approaches to combat cancer rely primarily on the use of chemicals and radiation, which are themselves carcinogenic and may promote recurrences and the development of metastatic disease.”

In a German study of elderly breast cancer patients (80 years old and older), where half received treatment involving chemotherapy and the other half received no treatment at all, the untreated group lived an average of 11 months longer.

An article on www.naturalsociety.com says it all…

“Cancer drugs, pushed by many drug companies as the only ‘scientific’ method of combating cancer alongside chemotherapy, have been found to actually make cancer worse and kill patients more quickly. The findings come after research was conducted on the cancer drugs at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.  Sold at a premium price to cancer sufferers, it turns out these drugs are not only ineffective but highly dangerous.

Something known as anti-angiogenesis is the primary function behind many such widely-used cancer drugs that were analyzed in the study.  Researchers examined drugs such as imatanib (a leukemia drug that goes by the brand name Gleevec) and sunitinib (a drug for gastrointestinal tumors — brand name Sutent), finding that these drugs may initially reduce tumor size but afterwards cause tumors to ‘metastasize’ aggressively. This means that the tumors come back much stronger and grow much larger than their original size.

As a result, patients develop life-threatening tumors that oftentimes kill patients more quickly as a result of taking the drug.

When study researchers induced anti-angiogenesis in mice, there was an initial 30% decrease in the volume of the tumor over 25 days. Afterwards, however, the tumors that had metastasized to the lungs tripled.  Researchers published the findings in the January 17 issue of Cancer Cell, with study authors shocked by the findings.

“Whatever manipulations we’re doing to tumors can inadvertently do something to increase the tumor numbers to become more metastatic, which is what kills patients at the end of the day,” said study author Dr. Raghu Kalluri.

It is clear that these cancer drugs are virtually ineffective at treating cancer, even killing patients who may have otherwise survived.  Of course a number of natural anti-cancer substances do exist that have been found to be largely effective in reducing tumor size and most importantly combating the onset of cancer.  Perhaps the most amazing anti-cancer substance for your health is high quality turmeric.  Turmeric has been found to reduce tumors by an astounding 81% in recent cancer research.  And contrary to cancer drugs, turmeric does not come loaded with deadly side effects.

Quite the opposite, turmeric instead comes with beneficial properties that can prevent your risk of disease and positively affect over 560 conditions.

Vitamin D is another essential anti-cancer nutrient.  Amazingly, vitamin D is much more effective than pharmaceutical drugs at fighting cancer, and is virtually a free nutrient.  Instead of paying a premium price for deadly cancer drugs, your vitamin D levels can be significantly improved by soaking up some sunlight.  It is important to receive a blood test to ensure you are within the optimal vitamin D level range.  The correct test you should receive is 25(OH)D, also called 25-hydroxyvitamin D.  The optimal range is 50-70 ng/ml, though if you are fighting cancer or heart disease it is 70-100 ng/ml.”

In a further article, published on www.activistpost.com, it was highlighted that chemotherapy can make cancer far worse, due to its damaging effects on healthy surrounding tissues…

“A team of researchers looking into why cancer cells are so resilient, accidentally stumbled upon a far more important discovery.  While conducting their research, the team discovered that chemotherapy actually heavily damages healthy cells and subsequently triggers them to release a protein that sustains and fuels tumor growth.  Beyond that, it even makes the tumor highly resistant to future treatment.

Reporting their findings in the journal Nature Medicine, the scientists report that the findings were ‘completely unexpected’.  Finding evidence of significant DNA damage when examining the effects of chemotherapy on tissue derived from men with prostate cancer, the writings are a big slap in the face to mainstream medical organizations who have been pushing chemotherapy for years as the only option available to cancer patients.

The news comes after it was previously revealed by similarly breaking research that expensive cancer drugs not only fail to treat tumors, but actually make them far worse.  The cancer drugs were found to make tumors ‘metastasize’ and grow massively in size after consumption.  As a result, the drugs killed the patients more quickly.

Known as WNT16B, scientists who performed the research say that this protein created from chemo treatment boosts cancer cell survival and is the reason that chemotherapy actually ends lives more quickly.

Co-author Peter Nelson of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle explains:

“WNT16B, when secreted, would interact with nearby tumour cells and cause them to grow, invade, and importantly, resist subsequent therapy.”

The team then complemented the statement with a word of their own:

“Our results indicate that damage responses in benign cells… may directly contribute to enhanced tumour growth kinetics.”

Meanwhile, dirt cheap substances like turmeric and ginger have consistently been found to effectively shrink tumors and combat the spread of cancer.  In a review of 11 studies, it was found that turmeric use reduced brain tumor size by a shocking 81%. Further research has also shown that turmeric is capable of halting cancer cell growth altogether.  One woman recently hit the mainstream headlines by revealing her victory against cancer with the principal spice used being turmeric.

This accidental finding reached by scientists further shows the lack of real science behind many ‘old paradigm’ treatments, despite what many health officials would like you to believe.  The truth of the matter is that natural alternatives do not even receive nearly as much funding as pharmaceutical drugs and medical interventions because there’s simply no room for profit.  If everyone was using turmeric and vitamin D for cancer (better yet, cancer prevention), major drug companies would lose out.”

It makes grim reading when you know that the main institutions take decades to change their strategies.

But it would be entirely irresponsible of me to recommend, or dissuade you from engaging in any particular course of treatment.  It is between you and your doctor to decide what is appropriate for you, but I would ask you to question your doctor about the absolute success rate of his or her proposed course of treatment, and whether it is wise to engage in a treatment that deteriorates, if not destroys, your immune system and quality of life.

If your Doctor cannot give you accurate absolute statistics, or will not support your choices, perhaps you should find a different Doctor?

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Cancer Treatment

The following articles help to explain the current cancer treatments that are considered mainstream in many (but not all) countries and discuss the scientific discoveries that could yield the next breakthroughs in cancer treatment.  However, you should also visit our Alternative Medicine section to see what complementary therapies are available outside of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.  Visit our latest news and articles section for more information.

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Trojan horse cancer strategy eliminates disease in mice

Some very interesting research being done by the University of Sheffield using cancer-killing viruses in mice.

Trojan horse cancer strategy eliminates disease in mice | MyFOX8.com – Greensboro, High-Point, Winston-Salem News & weather from WGHP Television FOX8

“Researchers in the UK said an experimental “Trojan horse” cancer therapy “completely eliminated” the disease in mice.According to BBC News, the team hid cancer killing viruses inside the immune system in order to sneak them into a tumor.”

The initial results are very encouraging, although as Prof Claire Lewis from the University says, many remarkable advances in treating mice have failed to have any effect in people


Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.